← Match Center
Estonia Esiliiga B · EE

Tabasalu FC Charma vs JK Trans Narva II

19 Oct 2026 · 18:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Different Recent Results for the Two Sides

The home side have lost their last 3 matches, while the visitors have won their last 6 matches.

For the visitors, accuracy was higher in the latest two complete-data matches (55.6% versus 40.0% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 5 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 10.2 shots per match and conceded 11 goals in that sample. Across 5 such matches, the visitors averaged 22.0 shots per match and conceded 2 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.50 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 2.21. The visitors averaged 1.50 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 2.21.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

JK Trans Narva II has the stronger recent profile

The away side has the stronger recent profile in both attack and defence.

Attack Recent attacking output
Tabasalu FC Charma JK Trans Narva II
Shots 9.5 · On target 3.3 Shots 22.8 · On target 10.3

Recent attacking output favours JK Trans Narva II, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Tabasalu FC Charma JK Trans Narva II
Shots allowed 13.8 · On target allowed 7.5 Shots allowed 8.5 · On target allowed 4.3

JK Trans Narva II has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Tabasalu FC Charma JK Trans Narva II

The combined recent performance profile favours JK Trans Narva II.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Estonia Esiliiga B · 134 matches with scores · 114 with shots · coverage 85.1%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Tabasalu FC Charma6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
LLLDLW
Shot data available for 5/6 matches
JK Trans Narva II6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WWWWWW
Shot data available for 5/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
−4.210.2 actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
+8.222.0 actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 10.2 · league average 14.4 · 5 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 22.0 · league average 13.8 · 5 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
+0.414.2 actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
−5.29.2 actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 14.2 · league average 13.8 · 5 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 9.2 · league average 14.4 · 5 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
−3.04.0 actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
+3.510.2 actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 4.0 · league average 7.0 · 5 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 10.2 · league average 6.7 · 5 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
+0.77.4 actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
−2.64.4 actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 7.4 · league average 6.7 · 5 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 4.4 · league average 7.0 · 5 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
−0.711.50 actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
−0.711.50 actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 1.50 · league average 2.21 · 6 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 1.50 · league average 2.21 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
−2.3 pp13.7% actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
−9.3 pp6.4% actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 13.7% · league average 16.0% · 5 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 6.4% · league average 15.6% · 5 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Tabasalu FC CharmaHome team
−0.1 pp15.5% actual
JK Trans Narva IIAway team
−11.7 pp4.4% actual
Tabasalu FC Charma: 15.5% · league average 15.6% · 5 valid matchesJK Trans Narva II: 4.4% · league average 16.0% · 5 valid matches

Individual match details

Tabasalu FC Charma · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
14/10/2026Away1–211 / 144 / 7
11/10/2026Home1–28 / 142 / 9
19/09/2026Away2–3——
14/09/2026Home1–19 / 112 / 5
11/09/2026Away1–410 / 165 / 9
05/09/2026Home3–213 / 167 / 7
JK Trans Narva II · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
15/10/2026Home2–0——
11/10/2026Away1–030 / 919 / 3
26/09/2026Away2–115 / 56 / 1
19/09/2026Away2–123 / 108 / 7
15/09/2026Home1–023 / 108 / 6
11/09/2026Home1–019 / 1210 / 5

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.