← Match Center
Japan Women Empowerment League · JP

INAC Leonessa (W) vs JEF Utd Chiba (W)

21 Oct 2026 · 05:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

A Recent Meeting and Recent Form

The teams met on 23 September 2026, when the current visitors won (2–3 from the upcoming home side’s perspective). The current home side recorded 14 shots (6 on target), compared with 16 (5 on target) for the visitors.

The visitors have won their last 2 matches.

For the home side, finishing was higher in the latest two complete-data matches (33.3% versus 15.0% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 6 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 13.2 shots per match and conceded 12 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 11.3 shots per match and conceded 7 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.33 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.36. The visitors averaged 1.83 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.35.

Model & Market Perspective

The largest positive model-market difference concerns a home win for INAC Leonessa (W). StochasticBet assigns this outcome a probability of 62.5%, compared with 60.9% in the margin-adjusted Pinnacle market assessment (a difference of +1.6 percentage points).

Across recent matches with recorded shooting data, INAC Leonessa (W) averaged 13.2 shots per match and JEF Utd Chiba (W) averaged 11.3. The shooting comparison does not provide strong additional support for this outcome. However, the visitors have conceded fewer goals in their recent matches, which calls for caution.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Pinnacle pre-match reference odds of 1.51 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 1.60. At this price, a home win for INAC Leonessa (W) does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · PINNACLE
HOME MODEL > MARKET
INAC Leonessa (W)
STOCHASTICBET 62.5%
PINNACLE 60.9% odd 1.51
DIFFERENCE +1.6 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 22.1%
PINNACLE 22.6% odd 4.06
DIFFERENCE -0.5 pp
AWAY
JEF Utd Chiba (W)
STOCHASTICBET 15.4%
PINNACLE 16.6% odd 5.52
DIFFERENCE -1.1 pp
STOCHASTICBET
PINNACLE MARKET
Market · PINNACLE Snapshot · 20 Oct 2026 · 18:01
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Defensive Edge: INAC Leonessa (W)

Recent attacking and defensive numbers do not show a clear overall edge.

Attack Recent attacking output
INAC Leonessa (W) JEF Utd Chiba (W)
Shots 12.3 · On target 5.0 Shots 9.8 · On target 5.8

Recent attacking output is broadly balanced between the two teams.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
INAC Leonessa (W) JEF Utd Chiba (W)
Shots allowed 11.8 · On target allowed 5.5 Shots allowed 13.0 · On target allowed 6.0

Recent defensive numbers are broadly balanced between the two teams.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
INAC Leonessa (W) JEF Utd Chiba (W)

The combined recent performance profile is relatively balanced.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Market Momentum

Normalized implied probability movement · percentage points · as of 2026-10-20 22:43:01

6h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME +2.92 pp +2.43 pp
DRAW -1.23 pp -0.53 pp
AWAY -1.69 pp -1.90 pp

Market Agreement: HOME UP

24h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — —
DRAW — —
AWAY — —

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

Based on available observation endpoints; continuous coverage is not verified. Unavailable values are not zero movements. Market movement is descriptive, not a prediction.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Japan Women Empowerment League · 49 matches with scores · 48 with shots · coverage 98.0%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

INAC Leonessa (W)6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
WDDLLL
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
JEF Utd Chiba (W)6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WWLDWW
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
+1.613.2 actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
−0.311.3 actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 13.2 · league average 11.5 · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 11.3 · league average 11.6 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
+0.612.3 actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
+1.613.2 actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 12.3 · league average 11.7 · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 13.2 · league average 11.6 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
+0.65.8 actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
+1.26.5 actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 5.8 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 6.5 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
+0.25.5 actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
+0.96.2 actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 5.5 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 6.2 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
−0.031.33 actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
+0.481.83 actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 1.33 · league average 1.36 · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 1.83 · league average 1.35 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
−1.7 pp10.1% actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
+4.4 pp16.2% actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 10.1% · league average 11.9% · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 16.2% · league average 11.8% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
INAC Leonessa (W)Home team
+4.6 pp16.2% actual
JEF Utd Chiba (W)Away team
−2.9 pp8.9% actual
INAC Leonessa (W): 16.2% · league average 11.6% · 6 valid matchesJEF Utd Chiba (W): 8.9% · league average 11.8% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

INAC Leonessa (W) · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Away4–39 / 118 / 6
11/10/2026Away1–124 / 47 / 2
03/10/2026Away0–07 / 131 / 5
27/09/2026Home0–39 / 194 / 9
23/09/2026Away2–314 / 166 / 5
19/09/2026Home1–216 / 119 / 6
JEF Utd Chiba (W) · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Home2–18 / 135 / 7
10/10/2026Home3–111 / 156 / 5
04/10/2026Away1–211 / 135 / 7
27/09/2026Away1–19 / 117 / 5
23/09/2026Home3–216 / 145 / 6
19/09/2026Away1–013 / 1311 / 7

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.