← Match Center
Japan Women Empowerment League · JP

Nojima (W) vs Albirex Niigata (W)

21 Oct 2026 · 11:30
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Recent Shooting Performance in Focus

Across 6 and 6 recent matches with recorded scores, respectively, the home side won 2 and the visitors won 1.

For the visitors, finishing was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (0.0% versus 22.7% in the earlier complete-data matches); for the visitors, accuracy was higher in the latest two complete-data matches (60.0% versus 40.7% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 6 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 13.5 shots per match and conceded 8 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 13.2 shots per match and conceded 6 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.50 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.36. The visitors averaged 0.83 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.35.

Model & Market Perspective

The largest positive model-market difference concerns a home win for Nojima (W). StochasticBet assigns this outcome a probability of 36.5%, compared with 36.0% in the margin-adjusted Pinnacle market assessment (a difference of +0.4 percentage points).

Across recent matches with recorded shooting data, Nojima (W) averaged 13.5 shots per match and Albirex Niigata (W) averaged 13.2. The shooting comparison does not provide strong additional support for this outcome. However, the visitors have conceded fewer goals in their recent matches, which calls for caution.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Pinnacle pre-match reference odds of 2.54 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 2.74. At this price, a home win for Nojima (W) does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · PINNACLE
HOME MODEL > MARKET
Nojima (W)
STOCHASTICBET 36.5%
PINNACLE 36.0% odd 2.54
DIFFERENCE +0.4 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 29.9%
PINNACLE 29.9% odd 3.06
DIFFERENCE -0.1 pp
AWAY
Albirex Niigata (W)
STOCHASTICBET 33.7%
PINNACLE 34.0% odd 2.69
DIFFERENCE -0.4 pp
STOCHASTICBET
PINNACLE MARKET
Market · PINNACLE Snapshot · 20 Oct 2026 · 15:01
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: Albirex Niigata (W)

Recent attacking and defensive numbers do not show a clear overall edge.

Attack Recent attacking output
Nojima (W) Albirex Niigata (W)
Shots 12.0 · On target 4.3 Shots 13.5 · On target 6.8

Recent attacking output favours Albirex Niigata (W), combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Nojima (W) Albirex Niigata (W)
Shots allowed 10.5 · On target allowed 5.3 Shots allowed 13.8 · On target allowed 7.0

Nojima (W) has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Nojima (W) Albirex Niigata (W)

The combined recent performance profile is relatively balanced.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Market Momentum

Normalized implied probability movement · percentage points · as of 2026-10-20 22:43:01

6h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME +0.00 pp +0.00 pp
DRAW +0.00 pp +0.00 pp
AWAY +0.00 pp +0.00 pp

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

24h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — —
DRAW — —
AWAY — —

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

Based on available observation endpoints; continuous coverage is not verified. Unavailable values are not zero movements. Market movement is descriptive, not a prediction.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Japan Women Empowerment League · 49 matches with scores · 48 with shots · coverage 98.0%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Nojima (W)6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
DLDWDW
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
Albirex Niigata (W)6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
DLLDWL
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
+2.013.5 actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
+1.613.2 actual
Nojima (W): 13.5 · league average 11.5 · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 13.2 · league average 11.6 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
−0.910.8 actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
+3.615.2 actual
Nojima (W): 10.8 · league average 11.7 · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 15.2 · league average 11.6 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
+0.96.2 actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
+0.96.2 actual
Nojima (W): 6.2 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 6.2 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
+0.65.8 actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
+1.66.8 actual
Nojima (W): 5.8 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 6.8 · league average 5.3 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
+0.141.50 actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
−0.520.83 actual
Nojima (W): 1.50 · league average 1.36 · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 0.83 · league average 1.35 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
−0.7 pp11.1% actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
−5.4 pp6.3% actual
Nojima (W): 11.1% · league average 11.9% · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 6.3% · league average 11.8% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Nojima (W)Home team
+0.7 pp12.3% actual
Albirex Niigata (W)Away team
−5.2 pp6.6% actual
Nojima (W): 12.3% · league average 11.6% · 6 valid matchesAlbirex Niigata (W): 6.6% · league average 11.8% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Nojima (W) · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Away2–210 / 165 / 10
10/10/2026Away1–315 / 115 / 6
04/10/2026Home1–113 / 62 / 2
27/09/2026Away2–010 / 95 / 3
23/09/2026Home1–122 / 714 / 5
19/09/2026Away2–111 / 166 / 9
Albirex Niigata (W) · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
17/10/2026Home0–013 / 1110 / 5
12/10/2026Away0–112 / 115 / 6
04/10/2026Home1–217 / 126 / 7
27/09/2026Home1–112 / 216 / 10
23/09/2026Away3–117 / 249 / 11
19/09/2026Away0–18 / 121 / 2

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.