← Match Center
Guatemala Liga Nacional · GT

Antigua GFC vs Xelaju

20 Oct 2026 · 03:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

A Recent Meeting Between the Sides

The teams met on 24 September 2026, when the current visitors won (0–4 from the upcoming home side’s perspective). The current home side recorded 8 shots (3 on target), compared with 15 (10 on target) for the visitors.

For the visitors, accuracy was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (40.5% versus 65.8% in the earlier complete-data matches); for the visitors, finishing was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (20.0% versus 40.0% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 6 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 7.0 shots per match and conceded 12 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 12.5 shots per match and conceded 8 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.00 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.25. The visitors averaged 2.17 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.55.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: Xelaju

The away side shows the stronger recent attacking profile, while the defensive comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Antigua GFC Xelaju
Shots 6.8 · On target 2.3 Shots 13.3 · On target 6.3

Recent attacking output favours Xelaju, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Antigua GFC Xelaju
Shots allowed 11.0 · On target allowed 3.5 Shots allowed 6.8 · On target allowed 3.8

Xelaju has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Antigua GFC Xelaju

The combined recent performance profile favours Xelaju.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Guatemala Liga Nacional · 107 matches with scores · 99 with shots · coverage 92.5%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Antigua GFC6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
DWDLLL
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
Xelaju6 matches · 4 home / 2 away
WLWLWD
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
−1.77.0 actual
XelajuAway team
+2.312.5 actual
Antigua GFC: 7.0 · league average 8.7 · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 12.5 · league average 10.3 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
+1.311.5 actual
XelajuAway team
−1.77.0 actual
Antigua GFC: 11.5 · league average 10.3 · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 7.0 · league average 8.7 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
−1.02.7 actual
XelajuAway team
+2.26.7 actual
Antigua GFC: 2.7 · league average 3.7 · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 6.7 · league average 4.4 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
+0.44.8 actual
XelajuAway team
0.03.7 actual
Antigua GFC: 4.8 · league average 4.4 · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 3.7 · league average 3.7 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
−0.251.00 actual
XelajuAway team
+0.622.17 actual
Antigua GFC: 1.00 · league average 1.25 · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 2.17 · league average 1.55 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
−0.2 pp14.3% actual
XelajuAway team
+2.2 pp17.3% actual
Antigua GFC: 14.3% · league average 14.5% · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 17.3% · league average 15.2% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Antigua GFCHome team
+2.2 pp17.4% actual
XelajuAway team
+4.6 pp19.1% actual
Antigua GFC: 17.4% · league average 15.2% · 6 valid matchesXelaju: 19.1% · league average 14.5% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Antigua GFC · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
15/10/2026Away1–16 / 152 / 8
12/10/2026Home2–15 / 73 / 2
09/10/2026Home1–15 / 01 / 0
03/10/2026Away1–211 / 223 / 4
27/09/2026Away1–37 / 104 / 5
24/09/2026Away0–48 / 153 / 10
Xelaju · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
15/10/2026Home2–127 / 711 / 3
10/10/2026Away1–210 / 124 / 6
04/10/2026Home2–010 / 26 / 1
27/09/2026Home2–36 / 64 / 5
24/09/2026Home4–015 / 810 / 3
21/09/2026Away2–27 / 75 / 4

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.