← Match Center
Latvia Virsliga · LV

RFS vs Tukums 2000

19 Oct 2026 · 18:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

The Home Side’s Recent Winning Run

The home side have won their last 2 matches.

For the home side, conversion was higher in the latest two complete-data matches (38.1% versus 9.4% in the earlier complete-data matches); for the home side, accuracy was higher in the latest two complete-data matches (61.9% versus 34.4% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 5 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 10.6 shots per match and conceded 4 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 8.8 shots per match and conceded 12 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 2.17 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.56. The visitors averaged 0.67 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.56.

Model & Market Perspective

The largest positive model-market difference concerns a home win for RFS. StochasticBet assigns this outcome a probability of 89.0%, compared with 87.4% in the margin-adjusted Pinnacle market assessment (a difference of +1.6 percentage points).

Across recent matches with recorded shooting data, RFS averaged 10.6 shots per match and Tukums 2000 averaged 8.8. The shooting comparison does not provide strong additional support for this outcome.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Pinnacle pre-match reference odds of 1.07 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 1.12. At this price, a home win for RFS does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · PINNACLE
HOME MODEL > MARKET
RFS
STOCHASTICBET 89.0%
PINNACLE 87.4% odd 1.07
DIFFERENCE +1.6 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 7.1%
PINNACLE 7.8% odd 11.93
DIFFERENCE -0.7 pp
AWAY
Tukums 2000
STOCHASTICBET 3.9%
PINNACLE 4.8% odd 19.61
DIFFERENCE -0.9 pp
STOCHASTICBET
PINNACLE MARKET
Market · PINNACLE Snapshot · 19 Oct 2026 · 15:31
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

RFS has the stronger recent profile

The home side has the stronger recent profile in both attack and defence.

Attack Recent attacking output
RFS Tukums 2000
Shots 9.5 · On target 5.8 Shots 9.3 · On target 3.5

Recent attacking output favours RFS, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
RFS Tukums 2000
Shots allowed 6.3 · On target allowed 2.8 Shots allowed 9.8 · On target allowed 4.8

RFS has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
RFS Tukums 2000

The combined recent performance profile favours RFS.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Market Momentum

Normalized implied probability movement · percentage points · as of 2026-10-19 15:43:02

6h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME +0.46 pp +0.00 pp
DRAW -0.23 pp +0.00 pp
AWAY -0.23 pp +0.00 pp

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

24h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — +0.81 pp
DRAW — -0.82 pp
AWAY — +0.01 pp

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

Based on available observation endpoints; continuous coverage is not verified. Unavailable values are not zero movements. Market movement is descriptive, not a prediction.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Latvia Virsliga · 125 matches with scores · 123 with shots · coverage 98.4%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

RFS6 matches · 4 home / 2 away
WWDWDL
Shot data available for 5/6 matches
Tukums 20006 matches · 4 home / 2 away
LDLWLL
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
RFSHome team
+0.710.6 actual
Tukums 2000Away team
−1.28.8 actual
RFS: 10.6 · league average 9.9 · 5 valid matchesTukums 2000: 8.8 · league average 10.0 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
RFSHome team
−4.05.8 actual
Tukums 2000Away team
+2.612.3 actual
RFS: 5.8 · league average 9.8 · 5 valid matchesTukums 2000: 12.3 · league average 9.7 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
RFSHome team
+0.54.8 actual
Tukums 2000Away team
−0.53.8 actual
RFS: 4.8 · league average 4.3 · 5 valid matchesTukums 2000: 3.8 · league average 4.4 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
RFSHome team
−1.82.4 actual
Tukums 2000Away team
+1.35.5 actual
RFS: 2.4 · league average 4.2 · 5 valid matchesTukums 2000: 5.5 · league average 4.2 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
RFSHome team
+0.612.17 actual
Tukums 2000Away team
−0.890.67 actual
RFS: 2.17 · league average 1.56 · 6 valid matchesTukums 2000: 0.67 · league average 1.56 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
RFSHome team
+5.3 pp20.8% actual
Tukums 2000Away team
−8.2 pp7.6% actual
RFS: 20.8% · league average 15.4% · 5 valid matchesTukums 2000: 7.6% · league average 15.8% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
RFSHome team
−0.6 pp13.8% actual
Tukums 2000Away team
+2.2 pp16.2% actual
RFS: 13.8% · league average 14.4% · 5 valid matchesTukums 2000: 16.2% · league average 14.0% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

RFS · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
15/10/2026Home4–011 / 57 / 3
11/10/2026Home4–210 / 46 / 2
20/09/2026Away1–15 / 64 / 2
13/09/2026Away2–112 / 106 / 4
07/09/2026Home0–015 / 41 / 1
03/09/2026Home2–3——
Tukums 2000 · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
10/10/2026Home0–28 / 142 / 7
20/09/2026Home1–110 / 75 / 4
10/09/2026Away0–15 / 50 / 2
05/09/2026Home2–114 / 137 / 6
29/08/2026Home1–412 / 225 / 9
21/08/2026Away0–34 / 134 / 5

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.