← Match Center
Moldova Divizia Nationala · MD

FC Politehnica Chisinau vs Sheriff Tiraspol

24 Oct 2026 · 13:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Match Overview

Recent Performance

The home side have experienced mixed results recently. They have generated considerably more attempts than they have conceded.

The visitors have enjoyed a strong sequence of recent results. Goals have arrived regularly, while the defence has generally limited opposing scoring. They have generated considerably more attempts than they have conceded, although a greater share of attempts has reached the target in the more recent matches.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Sheriff Tiraspol has the stronger recent profile

The away side has the stronger recent profile in both attack and defence.

Attack Recent attacking output
FC Politehnica Chisinau Sheriff Tiraspol
Shots 8.8 · On target 3.8 Shots 15.8 · On target 7.5

Recent attacking output favours Sheriff Tiraspol, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
FC Politehnica Chisinau Sheriff Tiraspol
Shots allowed 5.8 · On target allowed 3.8 Shots allowed 5.5 · On target allowed 2.0

Sheriff Tiraspol has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
FC Politehnica Chisinau Sheriff Tiraspol

The combined recent performance profile favours Sheriff Tiraspol.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Moldova Divizia Nationala · 70 matches with scores · 64 with shots · coverage 91.4%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

FC Politehnica Chisinau6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WDLLWD
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
Sheriff Tiraspol6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WWWWDL
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
+0.89.7 actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
+4.413.3 actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 9.7 · league average 8.9 · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 13.3 · league average 8.9 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
−3.65.3 actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
−3.15.8 actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 5.3 · league average 8.9 · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 5.8 · league average 8.9 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
+0.14.0 actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
+2.16.0 actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 4.0 · league average 3.9 · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 6.0 · league average 3.9 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
−0.73.2 actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
−1.42.5 actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 3.2 · league average 3.9 · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 2.5 · league average 3.9 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
+0.271.67 actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
+1.603.00 actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 1.67 · league average 1.40 · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 3.00 · league average 1.40 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
+1.8 pp17.2% actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
+7.1 pp22.5% actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 17.2% · league average 15.4% · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 22.5% · league average 15.4% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
FC Politehnica ChisinauHome team
+9.6 pp25.0% actual
Sheriff TiraspolAway team
+1.7 pp17.1% actual
FC Politehnica Chisinau: 25.0% · league average 15.4% · 6 valid matchesSheriff Tiraspol: 17.1% · league average 15.4% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

FC Politehnica Chisinau · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Away4–120 / 37 / 3
11/10/2026Away3–33 / 43 / 4
19/09/2026Home0–15 / 72 / 3
12/09/2026Away1–27 / 93 / 5
05/09/2026Home2–111 / 76 / 4
29/08/2026Home0–012 / 23 / 0
Sheriff Tiraspol · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
17/10/2026Home2–011 / 105 / 4
10/10/2026Away5–215 / 68 / 2
20/09/2026Home7–030 / 015 / 0
13/09/2026Away1–07 / 62 / 2
05/09/2026Home2–29 / 42 / 4
29/08/2026Away1–28 / 94 / 3

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.