← Match Center
Russia Division 2 · RU

Ural-D Yekaterinburg vs FK Zenit Izhevsk

19 Oct 2026 · 10:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

A Recent Meeting and Recent Form

The teams met on 20 September 2026, when the current visitors won (1–2 from the upcoming home side’s perspective).

The visitors have won their last 2 matches.

Across 3 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 4.3 shots per match and conceded 2 goals in that sample. Across 3 such matches, the visitors averaged 6.0 shots per match and conceded 6 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.17 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.35. The visitors averaged 1.50 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.40.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: Ural-D Yekaterinburg

Recent attacking and defensive numbers do not show a clear overall edge.

Attack Recent attacking output
Ural-D Yekaterinburg FK Zenit Izhevsk
Shots 5.3 · On target 3.8 Shots 4.5 · On target 1.5

Recent attacking output favours Ural-D Yekaterinburg, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Ural-D Yekaterinburg FK Zenit Izhevsk
Shots allowed 11.3 · On target allowed 4.5 Shots allowed 7.3 · On target allowed 3.3

FK Zenit Izhevsk has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Ural-D Yekaterinburg FK Zenit Izhevsk

The combined recent performance profile is relatively balanced.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Historical odds not available for this match.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Russia Division 2 · 885 matches with scores · 435 with shots · coverage 49.2%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Ural-D Yekaterinburg6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
DLLLDW
Shot data available for 3/6 matches
FK Zenit Izhevsk6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WWLWWL
Shot data available for 3/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
−3.64.3 actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
−1.56.0 actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 4.3 · league average 7.9 · 3 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 6.0 · league average 7.5 · 3 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
+2.410.7 actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
+1.09.7 actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 10.7 · league average 8.3 · 3 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 9.7 · league average 8.7 · 3 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
−0.13.7 actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
−1.62.0 actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 3.7 · league average 3.8 · 3 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 2.0 · league average 3.6 · 3 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
+0.04.0 actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
+0.24.3 actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 4.0 · league average 4.0 · 3 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 4.3 · league average 4.2 · 3 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
−0.181.17 actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
+0.101.50 actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 1.17 · league average 1.35 · 6 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 1.50 · league average 1.40 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
+5.5 pp23.1% actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
−0.5 pp16.7% actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 23.1% · league average 17.6% · 3 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 16.7% · league average 17.1% · 3 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Ural-D YekaterinburgHome team
−11.7 pp6.3% actual
FK Zenit IzhevskAway team
+2.4 pp20.7% actual
Ural-D Yekaterinburg: 6.3% · league average 17.9% · 3 valid matchesFK Zenit Izhevsk: 20.7% · league average 18.3% · 3 valid matches

Individual match details

Ural-D Yekaterinburg · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
11/10/2026Away1–15 / 165 / 7
04/10/2026Home1–2——
27/09/2026Away2–3——
20/09/2026Away1–2——
13/09/2026Home1–14 / 94 / 3
06/09/2026Away1–04 / 72 / 2
FK Zenit Izhevsk · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
11/10/2026Home1–0——
04/10/2026Home3–1——
27/09/2026Away1–23 / 91 / 4
20/09/2026Home2–1——
13/09/2026Away2–19 / 75 / 3
07/09/2026Away0–36 / 130 / 6

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.