← Match Center
Israel Liga Alef South · IL

Kfar Saba 1928 vs Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon

19 Oct 2026 · 18:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Recent Match Performance

Across 6 and 6 recent matches with recorded scores, respectively, the home side won 2 and the visitors won 5.

Across 5 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 11.4 shots per match and conceded 8 goals in that sample. Across 4 such matches, the visitors averaged 10.8 shots per match and conceded 2 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.50 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.19. The visitors averaged 1.33 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.23.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Defensive Edge: Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon

The away side shows the stronger recent defensive profile, while the attacking comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Kfar Saba 1928 Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon
Shots 13.0 · On target 5.0 Shots 12.5 · On target 5.3

Recent attacking output is broadly balanced between the two teams.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Kfar Saba 1928 Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon
Shots allowed 17.0 · On target allowed 6.5 Shots allowed 10.0 · On target allowed 2.8

Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Kfar Saba 1928 Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon

The combined recent performance profile favours Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Israel Liga Alef South · 60 matches with scores · 58 with shots · coverage 96.7%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Kfar Saba 19286 matches · 2 home / 4 away
WLDLLW
Shot data available for 5/6 matches
Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon6 matches · 4 home / 2 away
WDWWWW
Shot data available for 4/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
+0.111.4 actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
−0.710.8 actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 11.4 · league average 11.3 · 5 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 10.8 · league average 11.5 · 4 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
+1.813.4 actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
−0.511.0 actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 13.4 · league average 11.6 · 5 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 11.0 · league average 11.5 · 4 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
+0.25.0 actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
−0.64.3 actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 5.0 · league average 4.8 · 5 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 4.3 · league average 4.9 · 4 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
+0.95.8 actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
−1.13.8 actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 5.8 · league average 4.9 · 5 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 3.8 · league average 4.9 · 4 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
+0.311.50 actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
+0.101.33 actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 1.50 · league average 1.19 · 6 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 1.33 · league average 1.23 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
−0.3 pp10.5% actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
+0.8 pp11.6% actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 10.5% · league average 10.9% · 5 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 11.6% · league average 10.8% · 4 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Kfar Saba 1928Home team
+1.2 pp11.9% actual
Hapoel Nir Ramat HasharonAway team
−6.3 pp4.6% actual
Kfar Saba 1928: 11.9% · league average 10.8% · 5 valid matchesHapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon: 4.6% · league average 10.8% · 4 valid matches

Individual match details

Kfar Saba 1928 · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
13/10/2026Away3–1——
09/10/2026Away0–36 / 202 / 11
01/10/2026Home2–214 / 157 / 5
24/09/2026Away0–114 / 145 / 5
17/09/2026Home0–111 / 84 / 5
09/09/2026Away4–112 / 107 / 3
Hapoel Nir Ramat Hasharon · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
12/10/2026Home2–0——
08/10/2026Home1–115 / 146 / 5
30/09/2026Away2–114 / 124 / 4
23/09/2026Home1–07 / 83 / 2
23/09/2026Home1–0——
18/09/2026Away1–07 / 104 / 4

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.