← Match Center
China Division 2 · CN

Nantong Haimen Codion vs Wuhan Three Towns Reserves

25 Oct 2026 · 12:30
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Match Overview

Recent Performance

The home side have maintained an unbeaten run. Goals have arrived regularly, while the defence has generally limited opposing scoring. They have generated considerably more attempts than they have conceded, although a smaller share of attempts has reached the target in the more recent matches.

The visitors have experienced mixed results recently. They have generated considerably more attempts than they have conceded.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: Nantong Haimen Codion

The home side shows the stronger recent attacking profile, while the defensive comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Nantong Haimen Codion Wuhan Three Towns Reserves
Shots 7.3 · On target 3.5 Shots 2.8 · On target 1.5

Recent attacking output favours Nantong Haimen Codion, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Nantong Haimen Codion Wuhan Three Towns Reserves
Shots allowed 7.0 · On target allowed 2.5 Shots allowed 2.8 · On target allowed 1.8

Wuhan Three Towns Reserves has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Nantong Haimen Codion Wuhan Three Towns Reserves

The combined recent performance profile is relatively balanced.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: China Division 2 · 277 matches with scores · 276 with shots · coverage 99.6%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Nantong Haimen Codion6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WDWWDD
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
Wuhan Three Towns Reserves6 matches · 4 home / 2 away
WDWLDW
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
+1.68.8 actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
−2.05.5 actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 8.8 · league average 7.2 · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 5.5 · league average 7.5 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
−0.76.5 actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
−3.63.3 actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 6.5 · league average 7.2 · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 3.3 · league average 6.9 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
+1.54.5 actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
+0.33.3 actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 4.5 · league average 3.0 · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 3.3 · league average 3.1 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
−0.12.8 actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
−1.21.7 actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 2.8 · league average 3.0 · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 1.7 · league average 2.8 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
+0.801.83 actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
+0.421.50 actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 1.83 · league average 1.03 · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 1.50 · league average 1.08 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
+6.4 pp20.8% actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
+12.9 pp27.3% actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 20.8% · league average 14.3% · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 27.3% · league average 14.4% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Nantong Haimen CodionHome team
−1.5 pp12.8% actual
Wuhan Three Towns ReservesAway team
+0.8 pp15.0% actual
Nantong Haimen Codion: 12.8% · league average 14.3% · 6 valid matchesWuhan Three Towns Reserves: 15.0% · league average 14.2% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Nantong Haimen Codion · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Away3–17 / 74 / 2
11/10/2026Away1–17 / 72 / 2
07/10/2026Home2–011 / 114 / 5
18/09/2026Away2–04 / 34 / 1
12/09/2026Home1–114 / 66 / 2
22/08/2026Home2–210 / 57 / 5
Wuhan Three Towns Reserves · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
17/10/2026Home2–02 / 02 / 0
11/10/2026Home1–11 / 11 / 1
06/10/2026Away2–05 / 62 / 2
18/09/2026Home0–23 / 41 / 4
12/09/2026Away0–010 / 96 / 3
23/08/2026Home4–012 / 08 / 0

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.