← Match Center
Iceland Premier League · IS

Fram Reykjavik vs IA Akranes

19 Oct 2026 · 21:15
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Recent Shooting Performance in Focus

Across 6 and 6 recent matches with recorded scores, respectively, the home side won 1 and the visitors won 2.

For the visitors, finishing was higher in the latest two complete-data matches (60.0% versus 33.3% in the earlier complete-data matches); for the home side, finishing was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (25.0% versus 50.0% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 6 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 12.8 shots per match and conceded 14 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 17.8 shots per match and conceded 12 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 2.00 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.97. The visitors averaged 2.17 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.97.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: IA Akranes

The home side shows the stronger recent defensive profile, while the attacking comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Fram Reykjavik IA Akranes
Shots 13.5 · On target 4.8 Shots 18.5 · On target 5.5

Recent attacking output favours IA Akranes, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Fram Reykjavik IA Akranes
Shots allowed 8.5 · On target allowed 5.8 Shots allowed 15.3 · On target allowed 8.3

Fram Reykjavik has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Fram Reykjavik IA Akranes

The combined recent performance profile is relatively balanced.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Iceland Premier League · 141 matches with scores · 138 with shots · coverage 97.9%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Fram Reykjavik6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
LDLDDW
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
IA Akranes6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
DWLWDD
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
+0.512.8 actual
IA AkranesAway team
+5.517.8 actual
Fram Reykjavik: 12.8 · league average 12.4 · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 17.8 · league average 12.4 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
−3.78.7 actual
IA AkranesAway team
+3.515.8 actual
Fram Reykjavik: 8.7 · league average 12.4 · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 15.8 · league average 12.4 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
−0.55.0 actual
IA AkranesAway team
−0.35.2 actual
Fram Reykjavik: 5.0 · league average 5.5 · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 5.2 · league average 5.5 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
−0.15.3 actual
IA AkranesAway team
+2.98.3 actual
Fram Reykjavik: 5.3 · league average 5.5 · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 8.3 · league average 5.5 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
+0.032.00 actual
IA AkranesAway team
+0.202.17 actual
Fram Reykjavik: 2.00 · league average 1.97 · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 2.17 · league average 1.97 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
−0.4 pp15.6% actual
IA AkranesAway team
−3.8 pp12.2% actual
Fram Reykjavik: 15.6% · league average 16.0% · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 12.2% · league average 16.0% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Fram ReykjavikHome team
+11.0 pp26.9% actual
IA AkranesAway team
−3.3 pp12.6% actual
Fram Reykjavik: 26.9% · league average 16.0% · 6 valid matchesIA Akranes: 12.6% · league average 16.0% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Fram Reykjavik · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
10/10/2026Home1–210 / 52 / 4
20/09/2026Away2–225 / 1510 / 9
15/09/2026Home1–38 / 43 / 4
06/09/2026Away2–211 / 104 / 6
30/08/2026Home2–24 / 42 / 3
24/08/2026Away4–319 / 149 / 6
IA Akranes · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
11/10/2026Away2–28 / 142 / 8
20/09/2026Home4–118 / 98 / 3
13/09/2026Away1–525 / 247 / 17
06/09/2026Home3–123 / 145 / 5
30/08/2026Away2–215 / 245 / 12
23/08/2026Home1–118 / 104 / 5

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.