← Match Center
Chile Cup · CL

Universidad de Chile vs CD Antofagasta

22 Oct 2026 · 00:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

A Recent Meeting Between the Sides

The teams met on 8 October 2026, when the current visitors won (0–2 from the upcoming home side’s perspective). The current home side recorded 15 shots (6 on target), compared with 16 (8 on target) for the visitors.

For the visitors, accuracy was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (33.3% versus 45.9% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 6 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 13.0 shots per match and conceded 5 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 17.7 shots per match and conceded 2 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 2.50 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.39. The visitors averaged 2.00 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.43.

Model & Market Perspective

The model identifies a slight model-market difference for a home win for Universidad de Chile. The difference indicates only a limited disagreement with market expectations.

Across recent matches with recorded shooting data, Universidad de Chile averaged 13.0 shots per match and CD Antofagasta averaged 17.7. The shooting comparison does not provide strong additional support for this outcome. However, the visitors have conceded fewer goals in their recent matches, which calls for caution.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Pinnacle pre-match reference odds of 1.37 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 1.46. At this price, a home win for Universidad de Chile does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · PINNACLE
HOME MODEL > MARKET
Universidad de Chile
STOCHASTICBET 68.4%
PINNACLE 66.9% odd 1.37
DIFFERENCE +1.5 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 18.6%
PINNACLE 19.0% odd 4.81
DIFFERENCE -0.5 pp
AWAY
CD Antofagasta
STOCHASTICBET 13.0%
PINNACLE 14.0% odd 6.52
DIFFERENCE -1.0 pp
STOCHASTICBET
PINNACLE MARKET
Market · PINNACLE Snapshot · 21 Oct 2026 · 12:51
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: CD Antofagasta

The home side shows the stronger recent defensive profile, while the attacking comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Universidad de Chile CD Antofagasta
Shots 11.3 · On target 5.5 Shots 14.8 · On target 5.8

Recent attacking output is broadly balanced between the two teams.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Universidad de Chile CD Antofagasta
Shots allowed 8.0 · On target allowed 3.8 Shots allowed 15.8 · On target allowed 4.3

Universidad de Chile has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Universidad de Chile CD Antofagasta

The combined recent performance profile is relatively balanced.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Market Momentum

Normalized implied probability movement · percentage points · as of 2026-10-21 20:13:03

6h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME +0.00 pp +0.00 pp
DRAW +0.00 pp +0.00 pp
AWAY +0.00 pp +0.00 pp

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

24h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — —
DRAW — —
AWAY — —

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

Based on available observation endpoints; continuous coverage is not verified. Unavailable values are not zero movements. Market movement is descriptive, not a prediction.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Chile Cup · 100 matches with scores · 99 with shots · coverage 99.0%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Universidad de Chile6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WLDWWW
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
CD Antofagasta6 matches · 4 home / 2 away
DWWWWD
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
+1.213.0 actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
+5.617.7 actual
Universidad de Chile: 13.0 · league average 11.8 · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 17.7 · league average 12.1 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
−2.69.2 actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
+3.014.5 actual
Universidad de Chile: 9.2 · league average 11.8 · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 14.5 · league average 11.5 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
+1.56.2 actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
+2.87.7 actual
Universidad de Chile: 6.2 · league average 4.7 · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 7.7 · league average 4.8 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
−1.03.7 actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
+0.14.7 actual
Universidad de Chile: 3.7 · league average 4.7 · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 4.7 · league average 4.6 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
+1.112.50 actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
+0.572.00 actual
Universidad de Chile: 2.50 · league average 1.39 · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 2.00 · league average 1.43 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
+7.4 pp19.2% actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
−0.6 pp11.3% actual
Universidad de Chile: 19.2% · league average 11.8% · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 11.3% · league average 11.9% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Universidad de ChileHome team
−2.7 pp9.1% actual
CD AntofagastaAway team
−9.4 pp2.3% actual
Universidad de Chile: 9.1% · league average 11.8% · 6 valid matchesCD Antofagasta: 2.3% · league average 11.7% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Universidad de Chile · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
12/10/2026Home6–017 / 79 / 4
08/10/2026Away0–215 / 166 / 8
27/09/2026Home1–111 / 95 / 3
27/09/2026Away1–02 / 02 / 0
13/09/2026Away3–012 / 133 / 3
06/09/2026Home4–221 / 1012 / 4
CD Antofagasta · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Away0–010 / 183 / 4
11/10/2026Home3–011 / 164 / 3
08/10/2026Home2–016 / 158 / 6
04/10/2026Home2–022 / 148 / 4
27/09/2026Home4–124 / 1013 / 4
24/09/2026Away1–123 / 1410 / 7

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.