← Match Center
Northern Ireland Reserve League · GB

Cliftonville Reserves vs Carrick Rangers Reserves

19 Oct 2026 · 21:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

The Visitors’ Recent Results

The visitors have lost their last 3 matches.

For the home side, finishing was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (8.3% versus 33.3% in the earlier complete-data matches); for the home side, conversion was lower in the latest two complete-data matches (4.0% versus 18.2% in the earlier complete-data matches).

Across 5 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 11.6 shots per match and conceded 4 goals in that sample. Across 6 such matches, the visitors averaged 11.2 shots per match and conceded 22 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 1.33 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.94. The visitors averaged 1.67 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.94.

Model & Market Perspective

The largest positive model-market difference concerns a home win for Cliftonville Reserves. StochasticBet assigns this outcome a probability of 78.6%, compared with 74.9% in the margin-adjusted Pinnacle market assessment (a difference of +3.7 percentage points).

Across recent matches with recorded shooting data, Cliftonville Reserves averaged 11.6 shots per match and Carrick Rangers Reserves averaged 11.2. The shooting comparison does not provide strong additional support for this outcome.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Pinnacle pre-match reference odds of 1.18 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 1.27. At this price, a home win for Cliftonville Reserves does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · PINNACLE
HOME MODEL > MARKET
Cliftonville Reserves
STOCHASTICBET 78.6%
PINNACLE 74.9% odd 1.18
DIFFERENCE +3.7 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 12.5%
PINNACLE 13.7% odd 6.44
DIFFERENCE -1.3 pp
AWAY
Carrick Rangers Reserves
STOCHASTICBET 8.9%
PINNACLE 11.4% odd 7.76
DIFFERENCE -2.5 pp
STOCHASTICBET
PINNACLE MARKET
Market · PINNACLE Snapshot · 19 Oct 2026 · 18:21
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Cliftonville Reserves has the stronger recent profile

The home side has the stronger recent profile in both attack and defence.

Attack Recent attacking output
Cliftonville Reserves Carrick Rangers Reserves
Shots 13.3 · On target 7.0 Shots 12.0 · On target 6.8

Recent attacking output is broadly balanced between the two teams.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Cliftonville Reserves Carrick Rangers Reserves
Shots allowed 7.8 · On target allowed 2.8 Shots allowed 22.8 · On target allowed 11.0

Cliftonville Reserves has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Cliftonville Reserves Carrick Rangers Reserves

The combined recent performance profile favours Cliftonville Reserves.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Market Momentum

Normalized implied probability movement · percentage points · as of 2026-10-19 18:23:02

6h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME -0.10 pp +0.55 pp
DRAW -0.03 pp -0.73 pp
AWAY +0.12 pp +0.18 pp

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

24h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — +0.55 pp
DRAW — -0.73 pp
AWAY — +0.18 pp

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

Based on available observation endpoints; continuous coverage is not verified. Unavailable values are not zero movements. Market movement is descriptive, not a prediction.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Northern Ireland Reserve League · 52 matches with scores · 50 with shots · coverage 96.2%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Cliftonville Reserves6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
WLWLLW
Shot data available for 5/6 matches
Carrick Rangers Reserves6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
LLLWLD
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
+0.511.6 actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
+0.211.2 actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 11.6 · league average 11.1 · 5 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 11.2 · league average 11.0 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
−4.36.6 actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
+9.720.7 actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 6.6 · league average 10.9 · 5 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 20.7 · league average 11.0 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
+0.46.0 actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
+0.86.3 actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 6.0 · league average 5.6 · 5 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 6.3 · league average 5.6 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
−3.12.4 actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
+3.99.5 actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 2.4 · league average 5.5 · 5 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 9.5 · league average 5.6 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
−0.611.33 actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
−0.271.67 actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 1.33 · league average 1.94 · 6 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 1.67 · league average 1.94 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
−6.4 pp12.1% actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
−3.0 pp14.9% actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 12.1% · league average 18.4% · 5 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 14.9% · league average 18.0% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Cliftonville ReservesHome team
−5.4 pp12.1% actual
Carrick Rangers ReservesAway team
−0.2 pp17.7% actual
Cliftonville Reserves: 12.1% · league average 17.5% · 5 valid matchesCarrick Rangers Reserves: 17.7% · league average 18.0% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Cliftonville Reserves · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
07/10/2026Home1–012 / 66 / 1
30/09/2026Away0–113 / 136 / 5
21/09/2026Home4–020 / 513 / 2
14/09/2026Away1–2——
31/08/2026Home0–28 / 73 / 3
26/08/2026Away2–15 / 22 / 1
Carrick Rangers Reserves · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
12/10/2026Away2–513 / 188 / 12
07/10/2026Home0–710 / 334 / 13
21/09/2026Home2–312 / 196 / 9
14/09/2026Away3–213 / 219 / 10
07/09/2026Home1–38 / 193 / 6
31/08/2026Away2–211 / 148 / 7

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.