← Match Center
Israel Cup Women · IL

Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W) vs Kiryat Gat SC (W)

19 Oct 2026 · 18:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

A Recent Meeting and Recent Form

The teams met on 24 September 2026, when the current home side won (4–2 from the upcoming home side’s perspective). The current home side recorded 13 shots (8 on target), compared with 14 (7 on target) for the visitors.

The home side have won their last 5 matches.

Across 3 matches with complete shooting data, the home side averaged 9.7 shots per match and conceded 3 goals in that sample. Across 5 such matches, the visitors averaged 16.2 shots per match and conceded 7 goals.

In recent matches with recorded scores, the home side averaged 3.00 goals per match, against a weighted league reference of 1.81. The visitors averaged 2.67 goals per match, against their weighted league reference of 1.85.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Kiryat Gat SC (W) has the stronger recent profile

The away side has the stronger recent profile in both attack and defence.

Attack Recent attacking output
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W) Kiryat Gat SC (W)
Shots 10.8 · On target 6.3 Shots 15.3 · On target 8.0

Recent attacking output favours Kiryat Gat SC (W), combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W) Kiryat Gat SC (W)
Shots allowed 8.8 · On target allowed 4.5 Shots allowed 7.8 · On target allowed 4.0

Recent defensive numbers are broadly balanced between the two teams.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W) Kiryat Gat SC (W)

The combined recent performance profile favours Kiryat Gat SC (W).

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Israel Cup Women · 7 matches with scores · 5 with shots · coverage 71.4%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
WWWWWL
Shot data available for 3/6 matches
Kiryat Gat SC (W)6 matches · 3 home / 3 away
LWWWWW
Shot data available for 5/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
—Insufficient data
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
—Insufficient data
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): — · league average — · 3 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): — · league average — · 5 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
—Insufficient data
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
—Insufficient data
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): — · league average — · 3 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): — · league average — · 5 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
—Insufficient data
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
—Insufficient data
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): — · league average — · 3 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): — · league average — · 5 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
—Insufficient data
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
—Insufficient data
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): — · league average — · 3 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): — · league average — · 5 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
+1.193.00 actual
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
+0.822.67 actual
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): 3.00 · league average 1.81 · 6 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): 2.67 · league average 1.85 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
—Insufficient data
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
—Insufficient data
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): — · league average — · 3 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): — · league average — · 5 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W)Home team
—Insufficient data
Kiryat Gat SC (W)Away team
—Insufficient data
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W): — · league average — · 3 valid matchesKiryat Gat SC (W): — · league average — · 5 valid matches

Individual match details

Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem (W) · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
24/09/2026Home4–213 / 148 / 7
16/09/2026Away4–14 / 14 / 1
10/09/2026Home5–0——
25/08/2026Away3–012 / 117 / 6
25/07/2026Away1–0——
22/07/2026Away1–3——
Kiryat Gat SC (W) · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
24/09/2026Away2–414 / 137 / 8
16/09/2026Home5–021 / 412 / 1
10/09/2026Away1–011 / 35 / 2
20/08/2026Home2–115 / 118 / 5
25/05/2026Away3–1——
20/05/2026Home3–220 / 168 / 8

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.