← Match Center
Indonesia U20 League · ID

Persik Kediri U20 vs PSS Sleman U20

24 Oct 2026 · 08:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Match Overview

Model vs Market

The model identifies a clear model-market difference for an away win for PSS Sleman U20. The model is meaningfully more favourable to this outcome than the market.

Recent Performance

The home side have struggled to obtain positive results. Finding the net has been a recurring difficulty. They have faced considerably more attempts than they have produced.

The visitors have too few recent results available for a meaningful summary.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Bet365 pre-match reference odds of 1.33 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 1.36. At this price, an away win for PSS Sleman U20 does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · BET365
HOME
Persik Kediri U20
STOCHASTICBET 12.2%
BET365 16.3% odd 5.50
DIFFERENCE -4.2 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 14.4%
BET365 16.3% odd 5.50
DIFFERENCE -1.9 pp
AWAY MODEL > MARKET
PSS Sleman U20
STOCHASTICBET 73.4%
BET365 67.4% odd 1.33
DIFFERENCE +6.1 pp
STOCHASTICBET
BET365 MARKET
Market · BET365 Snapshot · 24 Oct 2026 · 04:11
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Defensive Edge: PSS Sleman U20

The away side shows the stronger recent defensive profile, while the attacking comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Persik Kediri U20 PSS Sleman U20
Shots 2.8 · On target 0.5 Shots 2.8 · On target 0.5

Recent attacking output is broadly balanced between the two teams.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Persik Kediri U20 PSS Sleman U20
Shots allowed 19.3 · On target allowed 5.8 Shots allowed 3.0 · On target allowed 0.8

PSS Sleman U20 has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Persik Kediri U20 PSS Sleman U20

The combined recent performance profile favours PSS Sleman U20.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Indonesia U20 League · 39 matches with scores · 38 with shots · coverage 97.4%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Persik Kediri U204 matches · 2 home / 2 away
DLLL
Shot data available for 4/4 matches
PSS Sleman U201 matches · 0 home / 1 away
L
Shot data available for 1/1 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
−7.42.8 actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 2.8 · league average 10.2 · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
+9.119.3 actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 19.3 · league average 10.2 · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
−3.60.5 actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 0.5 · league average 4.1 · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
+1.65.8 actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 5.8 · league average 4.1 · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
−1.400.00 actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 0.00 · league average 1.40 · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
−13.9 pp0.0% actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 0.0% · league average 13.9% · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Persik Kediri U20Home team
−2.2 pp11.7% actual
PSS Sleman U20Away team
—Insufficient data
Persik Kediri U20: 11.7% · league average 13.9% · 4 valid matchesPSS Sleman U20: — · league average — · 1 valid matches

Individual match details

Persik Kediri U20 · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
11/10/2026Away0–03 / 130 / 5
10/10/2026Away0–32 / 200 / 8
04/10/2026Home0–24 / 280 / 2
03/10/2026Home0–42 / 162 / 8
PSS Sleman U20 · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
10/10/2026Away1–211 / 122 / 3

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.