← Match Center
Austria Amateur Cup · AT

Hohenems vs FC Rotenberg

26 Oct 2026 · 14:00
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Match Overview

Model vs Market

The model identifies a slight model-market difference for a home win for Hohenems. The difference indicates only a limited disagreement with market expectations.

Recent Performance

The home side have enjoyed a strong sequence of recent results. Defensive difficulties have been apparent. Across the matches with available shooting data, their opponents have held a modest advantage in shooting volume.

The visitors have experienced mixed results recently. Defensive difficulties have been apparent.

Pre-Match Betting Perspective

Despite the positive model-market difference, the available Bet365 pre-match reference odds of 1.50 do not exceed the model's estimated fair odds of approximately 1.62. At this price, a home win for Hohenems does not appear sufficiently attractive. A more favourable price before kick-off would be needed.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE

Model vs Market

MARKET · BET365
HOME MODEL > MARKET
Hohenems
STOCHASTICBET 61.8%
BET365 59.5% odd 1.50
DIFFERENCE +2.3 pp
DRAW
Draw
STOCHASTICBET 19.5%
BET365 20.6% odd 4.33
DIFFERENCE -1.1 pp
AWAY
FC Rotenberg
STOCHASTICBET 18.7%
BET365 19.8% odd 4.50
DIFFERENCE -1.2 pp
STOCHASTICBET
BET365 MARKET
Market · BET365 Snapshot · 26 Oct 2026 · 01:21
PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Performance data unavailable

Recent team performance statistics are not available for this match.

Market Momentum

Normalized implied probability movement · percentage points · as of 2026-10-26 02:33:03

6h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — —
DRAW — —
AWAY — —

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

24h window

OutcomePinnacleBet365
HOME — —
DRAW — —
AWAY — —

No qualified strong agreement in this window.

Based on available observation endpoints; continuous coverage is not verified. Unavailable values are not zero movements. Market movement is descriptive, not a prediction.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Austria Amateur Cup · 38 matches with scores · 35 with shots · coverage 92.1%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Hohenems6 matches · 4 home / 2 away
WLLWWW
Shot data available for 4/6 matches
FC Rotenberg6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
WLWDLD
Shot data available for 0/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
+2.412.8 actual
FC RotenbergAway team
—Insufficient data
Hohenems: 12.8 · league average 10.3 · 4 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: — · league average — · 0 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
+2.815.3 actual
FC RotenbergAway team
—Insufficient data
Hohenems: 15.3 · league average 12.5 · 4 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: — · league average — · 0 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
+2.36.8 actual
FC RotenbergAway team
—Insufficient data
Hohenems: 6.8 · league average 4.4 · 4 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: — · league average — · 0 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
−1.15.0 actual
FC RotenbergAway team
—Insufficient data
Hohenems: 5.0 · league average 6.1 · 4 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: — · league average — · 0 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
+0.362.17 actual
FC RotenbergAway team
−0.122.33 actual
Hohenems: 2.17 · league average 1.81 · 6 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: 2.33 · league average 2.45 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
+5.3 pp21.6% actual
FC RotenbergAway team
—Insufficient data
Hohenems: 21.6% · league average 16.3% · 4 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: — · league average — · 0 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
HohenemsHome team
−11.4 pp9.8% actual
FC RotenbergAway team
—Insufficient data
Hohenems: 9.8% · league average 21.3% · 4 valid matchesFC Rotenberg: — · league average — · 0 valid matches

Individual match details

Hohenems · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
24/10/2026Home5–215 / 2811 / 9
18/10/2026Away0–3——
10/10/2026Home1–28 / 184 / 6
03/10/2026Away2–117 / 96 / 2
27/09/2026Home3–111 / 66 / 3
19/09/2026Home2–0——
FC Rotenberg · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
24/10/2026Away4–0——
16/10/2026Away1–3——
10/10/2026Home6–1——
04/10/2026Away2–2——
27/09/2026Home0–2——
19/09/2026Away1–1——

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.