← Match Center
Honduras Reserve League · HN

Lobos UPNFM Reserves vs CD Olimpia Reserves

27 Oct 2026 · 22:30
FOOTBALL MATCH INTELLIGENCE · MATCH OVERVIEW

Match Overview

Recent Performance

The home side have maintained an unbeaten run. Goals have arrived regularly, while the defence has generally limited opposing scoring. They have generated considerably more attempts than they have conceded.

The visitors have enjoyed a strong sequence of recent results. Goals have arrived regularly, while the defence has generally limited opposing scoring. They have generated considerably more attempts than they have conceded, although a greater share of attempts has reached the target in the more recent matches.

Statistical Context & Data Notes

Historical samples may involve different opponents, competitions and dates; shared fixtures are not independent. Missing shooting data are excluded. No xG, shot-quality or opponent-strength adjustment. Editorial selection thresholds are not significance tests; no prediction is implied.

Historical performance provides context rather than a prediction of the final result.

PERFORMANCE · LAST 4 MATCHES

Attacking Edge: CD Olimpia Reserves

The home side shows the stronger recent defensive profile, while the attacking comparison is less clear.

Attack Recent attacking output
Lobos UPNFM Reserves CD Olimpia Reserves
Shots 9.0 · On target 5.0 Shots 17.3 · On target 8.5

Recent attacking output favours CD Olimpia Reserves, combining shots and shots on target.

Defence Recent defensive resistance
Lobos UPNFM Reserves CD Olimpia Reserves
Shots allowed 2.8 · On target allowed 1.3 Shots allowed 11.3 · On target allowed 5.0

Lobos UPNFM Reserves has the stronger recent defensive profile, allowing fewer dangerous attempts.

Overall Performance Combined attack and defence
Lobos UPNFM Reserves CD Olimpia Reserves

The combined recent performance profile favours Lobos UPNFM Reserves.

Based on the teams' four most recent matches in the available data.

Explore recent match statisticsCharts and detailed data
RECENT FORM · LAST 6 MATCHES

Recent matches compared

These charts compare recent performance with the league average. The central line represents the benchmark: values to the right are higher and values to the left are lower. Higher values are not always better, particularly for defensive metrics.
Benchmark: Honduras Reserve League · 78 matches with scores · 77 with shots · coverage 98.7%.
Historical window: 180 days before kickoff. Shooting benchmarks require at least 30 complete matches.

How have the teams performed recently?

Most recent first · W win · D draw · L loss

Lobos UPNFM Reserves6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
WWDWDW
Shot data available for 6/6 matches
CD Olimpia Reserves6 matches · 2 home / 4 away
WWWLWL
Shot data available for 6/6 matches

Shots taken

Shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
0.09.8 actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
+5.215.0 actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 9.8 · league average 9.8 · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 15.0 · league average 9.8 · 6 valid matches

Shots conceded

Opposition shots per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
−6.73.8 actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
−1.29.3 actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 3.8 · league average 10.5 · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 9.3 · league average 10.5 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target

Shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
+0.44.8 actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
+2.46.8 actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 4.8 · league average 4.5 · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 6.8 · league average 4.5 · 6 valid matches

Shots on target conceded

Opposition shots on target per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
−3.31.7 actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
−1.13.8 actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 1.7 · league average 5.0 · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 3.8 · league average 5.0 · 6 valid matches

Goals scored

Goals per match · difference from league average

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
+0.632.33 actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
+0.302.00 actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 2.33 · league average 1.70 · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 2.00 · league average 1.70 · 6 valid matches

Shot conversion

Goals per shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
+6.1 pp23.7% actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
−4.3 pp13.3% actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 23.7% · league average 17.6% · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 13.3% · league average 17.6% · 6 valid matches

Goals conceded per shots faced

Goals conceded per opposition shot · difference from league average in percentage points

0 = league average
Lobos UPNFM ReservesHome team
−6.7 pp13.0% actual
CD Olimpia ReservesAway team
−10.8 pp8.9% actual
Lobos UPNFM Reserves: 13.0% · league average 19.7% · 6 valid matchesCD Olimpia Reserves: 8.9% · league average 19.7% · 6 valid matches

Individual match details

Lobos UPNFM Reserves · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
20/10/2026Away3–08 / 36 / 1
12/10/2026Home3–118 / 67 / 2
28/09/2026Away1–11 / 11 / 1
25/09/2026Home3–19 / 16 / 1
22/09/2026Away0–012 / 112 / 5
14/09/2026Away4–011 / 17 / 0
CD Olimpia Reserves · individual matches
DateVenueResultShots for/againstOn target for/against
18/10/2026Home1–017 / 97 / 4
10/10/2026Away3–118 / 910 / 4
24/09/2026Away3–015 / 109 / 3
21/09/2026Home2–319 / 178 / 9
17/09/2026Away3–018 / 75 / 1
08/09/2026Away0–13 / 42 / 2

The recent matches are the latest available before kickoff within the historical window and may include other competitions. The benchmark refers to the event league and is weighted by the home/away composition of the recent sample. Goals and shots may have different data coverage; conversion rates use only matches with paired observations. Benchmarks are reconstructed from match dates rather than certified data-capture timestamps. Opponent strength and chance quality (xG) are not adjusted for. Some statistics may be incomplete or anomalous. These indicators are descriptive, not predictive.